GRID K260Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 640, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 640 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 30 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	27−30	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	130−140
medium / 768p	180−190	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	50−55
QHD / 1440p	50−55	27−30
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	140−150	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	18−20	8−9
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
4K / 2160p	6−7	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	60−65
medium / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−12
QHD / 1440p	9−10	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	24−27
medium / 1080p	27−30	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	85−90	50−55
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
high / 1080p	30−33	12−14
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	9−10	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	110−120	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	55−60	24−27
medium / 768p	30−35	16−18
high / 1080p	18−20	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−12	6−7
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	35−40	18−20
high / 768p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Plus Graphics 640
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	3 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	52.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640

Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares