GRID K260Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |