GRID K260Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	110−120
medium / 768p	180−190	85−90
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 110% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	16−18	5−6
4K / 2160p	6−7	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	85−90	40−45
medium / 768p	75−80	35−40
high / 1080p	30−33	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	9−10	3−4
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 72% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	16−18
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	100−110	80−85
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name	GK104	Broadwell GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	2 June 2015
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	40.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	883.2 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares