GRID K260Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	5−6
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
GRID K260Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	210−220
medium / 768p	180−190	180−190
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	55−60
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	95−100
ultra / 1080p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	75−80	80−85
high / 1080p	30−33	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
GRID K260Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares