GRID K260Q vs Quadro FX 3800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro FX 3800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro FX 3800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 108 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
- GRID K260Q has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 3800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 145 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 750% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 143% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 119% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 733% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 226% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 2700% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 93% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 4−5 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1166% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro FX 3800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |