GRID K260Q vs Quadro FX 5800
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro FX 5800 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro FX 5800 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K260Q
Quadro FX 5800
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
189 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Check Price
GRID K260Q has 19% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 5800.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 5800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro FX 5800 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 5800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 135 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 5800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
3−4
ultra / 1080p
9−10
1−2
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
6−7
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
27−30
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K260Q and Quadro FX 5800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
95−100
ultra / 1080p
95−100
45−50
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
140−150
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
ultra / 1080p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
18−20
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
low / 720p
95−100
55−60
medium / 1080p
50−55
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
20−22
6−7
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
85−90
50−55
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
30−33
9−10
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
12−14
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
65−70
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
55−60
18−20
medium / 768p
30−35
12−14
high / 1080p
18−20
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−12
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
Full Specs
GRID K260Q
Quadro FX 5800
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Code name
GK104
GT200B
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
11 November 2008
Pipelines
1536
240
Core clock speed
745 MHz
610 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
48.80
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
622.1 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
3.3
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
1.3
Check Price
