GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2000M

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Quadro K2000M Check Price

Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:

Quadro K2000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	2−3
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	5−6
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	85−90	40−45
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	5−6
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	55−60	12−14
medium / 768p	30−35	8−9
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Quadro K2000M.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K2000M
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	N14P-Q3
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	1 June 2012
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	23.84
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	572.2 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		18 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2000M

Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares