GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2200M

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro K2200M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro K2200M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K260Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	20−22
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	140−150	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 36% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	120−130
medium / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	24−27
QHD / 1440p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
high / 1080p	30−33	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	70−75
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
medium / 768p	30−35	45−50
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 32% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.68
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K260Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares