GRID K260Q vs Quadro K620M
When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K620M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K620M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |