GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Quadro M1000M Check Price

Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:

Quadro M1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro M1000M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB/4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 248 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M is 5000 MHz.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	210−220
medium / 768p	180−190	180−190
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−105
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	140−150
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	95−100
ultra / 1080p	60−65	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	9−10	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	75−80	75−80
high / 1080p	30−33	30−35
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	30−33
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
GRID K260Q and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro M1000M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	2 October 2015
Pipelines	1536	512
Core clock speed	745 MHz	993 MHz
Boost Clock		1072 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	31.78
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,017 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.22 kh/s
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		140 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro M1000M

Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares