GRID K260Q vs Quadro M620

When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro M620, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

Quadro M620 Check Price

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:

Quadro M620 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro M620
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 273 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	200−210
medium / 768p	180−190	170−180
ultra / 1080p	95−100	95−100
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	140−150	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	20−22
QHD / 1440p	9−10	8−9
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	75−80	75−80
high / 1080p	30−33	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	3−4	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	9−10	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	16−18
GRID K260Q and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	55−60	50−55
medium / 768p	30−35	30−35
high / 1080p	18−20	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro M620.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro M620
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	13 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	512
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1018 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro M620

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares