GRID K260Q vs Quadro P2000

When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro P2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro P2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 331 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 2008 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 153% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	50−55
QHD / 1440p	7−8	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 143% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 152% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	9−10	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	30−33	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	9−10
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	70−75
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 123% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−12	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 156% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
high / 768p	50−55	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro P2000
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	GK104	GP106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	6 February 2017
Pipelines	1536	1024
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	94.72
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares