GRID K260Q vs Quadro P3200

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro P3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro P3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Quadro P3200 Check Price

Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:

Quadro P3200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro P3200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6084 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 37 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 2008 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	30−35	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	55−60
QHD / 1440p	7−8	40−45
4K / 2160p	5−6	21−24
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	190−200
QHD / 1440p	50−55	120−130
4K / 2160p	30−33	80−85
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	50−55
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	6−7	16−18
low / 720p	35−40	85−90
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 168% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	65−70
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	190−200
medium / 1080p	50−55	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	65−70
ultra / 1080p	20−22	50−55
QHD / 1440p	9−10	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	30−33	75−80
ultra / 1080p	12−14	35−40
QHD / 1440p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	27−30
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	10−11
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 191% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	9−10	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	16−18	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 141% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	140−150
medium / 768p	30−35	95−100
high / 1080p	18−20	50−55
ultra / 1080p	10−12	30−33
4K / 2160p	8−9	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	55−60
high / 768p	50−55	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro P3200
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	GK104	N18E-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	27 February 2017
Pipelines	1536	1792
Core clock speed	745 MHz	708 - 1202 MHz
Boost Clock		1228 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro P3200

Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares