GRID K260Q vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Quadro T1000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |