GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 4870 X2. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 4870 X2. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 27% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 45 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | R700 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | |