GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 6750
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 6750, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 6750.
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 6750
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
86 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K260Q has 161% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6750.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6750 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6750.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6750 - with TeraScale 2.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6750 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3950 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6750.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
1−2
ultra / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
16−18
medium / 1080p
27−30
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 6750 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
120−130
medium / 768p
180−190
90−95
ultra / 1080p
95−100
40−45
QHD / 1440p
50−55
24−27
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
140−150
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 6750 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
ultra / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
18−20
2−3
ultra / 1080p
16−18
2−3
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
18−20
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
16−18
2−3
low / 720p
95−100
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
18−20
medium / 1080p
27−30
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
30−33
5−6
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
9−10
1−2
ultra / 1080p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
5−6
medium / 1080p
12−14
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
6−7
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
55−60
12−14
medium / 768p
30−35
9−10
high / 1080p
18−20
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−12
3−4
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
16−18
high / 768p
50−55
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon HD 6750.
Full Specs
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 6750
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Code name
GK104
Juniper
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
28 June 2013
21 January 2011
Pipelines
1536
720
Core clock speed
745 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
25.20
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,008.0 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
73.6 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.0 x16
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
92 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
Check Price
