GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 7870M
When comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7870M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7870M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 7870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7870M here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 7870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7870M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7870M - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 7870M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7870M is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7870M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7870M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 52% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 7870M | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK104 | Heathrow XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |