GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro 450
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |