GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro W5500M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 85 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 164% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 7000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Navi 14 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 10 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1408 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1450 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 6,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 127.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |