GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 4130, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon Pro WX 4130 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |