GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 250

When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 250, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 250.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R7 250 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		N/A
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 250.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 250 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250 - with GCN.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	80−85
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 147% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 170% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	35−40
high / 1080p	30−33	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	1−2
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	9−10
medium / 1080p	12−14	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	55−60	18−20
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than Radeon R7 250.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 250
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK104	Oland XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 October 2013
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	25.20
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	716.8 gflops
Length		168 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		117 Mh/s
Design		reference
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 250

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares