GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M270
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M270 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Opal XT / Mars |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 7 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |