GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270DX.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R7 M270DX
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Topaz |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |