GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M350

When comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M350, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M350 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 M350
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	50−55
ultra / 1080p	60−65	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	2−3
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	5−6
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	55−60	12−14
medium / 768p	30−35	9−10
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M350.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 M350
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	19.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	779.5 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares