GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M365X

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M365X is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	0−1
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	12−14
medium / 1080p	27−30	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	110−120
medium / 768p	180−190	85−90
ultra / 1080p	95−100	35−40
QHD / 1440p	50−55	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	10−11
high / 768p	140−150	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	90−95	40−45
ultra / 1080p	60−65	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	9−10
medium / 1080p	18−20	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	1−2
low / 720p	95−100	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	2−3
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	85−90	40−45
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	9−10	1−2
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	2−3
medium / 1080p	12−14	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	24−27
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	55−60	7−8
medium / 768p	30−35	6−7
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	50−55	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	23.04
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	737.3 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares