GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 Fury

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 Fury, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon R9 Fury, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R9 Fury Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R9 Fury
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	275 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Radeon R9 Fury has 22% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 Fury has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 Fury - with GCN 1.2.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 Fury are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Fury.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	50−55
ultra / 1080p	9−10	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	75−80
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
QHD / 1440p	7−8	55−60
4K / 2160p	5−6	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	27−30	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 Fury have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	230−240
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
QHD / 1440p	50−55	150−160
4K / 2160p	30−33	100−110
high / 768p	140−150	220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	65−70
ultra / 1080p	16−18	60−65
QHD / 1440p	−	40−45
4K / 2160p	6−7	21−24
low / 720p	35−40	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	90−95
ultra / 1080p	18−20	70−75
QHD / 1440p	16−18	45−50
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	95−100	220−230
medium / 1080p	50−55	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Fortnite is 176% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	85−90
ultra / 1080p	20−22	65−70
QHD / 1440p	9−10	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	27−30	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	160−170
medium / 768p	75−80	150−160
high / 1080p	30−33	95−100
ultra / 1080p	12−14	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Grand Theft Auto V is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	30−35
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Metro Exodus is 291% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	75−80
ultra / 1080p	18−20	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	55−60	120−130
medium / 1080p	24−27	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 177% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	27−30	95−100
medium / 1080p	16−18	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 217% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	180−190
medium / 768p	30−35	120−130
high / 1080p	18−20	70−75
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
4K / 2160p	8−9	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	35−40	65−70
high / 768p	50−55	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Fury in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R9 Fury
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.2
Code name	GK104	Fiji
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	16 June 2015
Pipelines	1536	3584
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	224.0
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	7,168 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	512 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		800 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
TrueAudio		+
Mantle		+
Bridgeless CrossFire		+
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
VCE		+
DDMA audio		+
Compute units		56
AppAcceleration		+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
FRTC		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 Fury

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares