GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 M275
When choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M275, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M275.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 180 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 244% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |