GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M370X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon R9 M370X, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M370X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M370X - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M370X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M370X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M370X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 M370X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon R9 M370X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Cape Verde |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 19 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1500 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |