GRID K260Q vs Tesla M10

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Tesla M10

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla M10
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 288 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 200 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	220−230
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−33
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−12
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	30−33	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla M10.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
medium / 768p	30−35	40−45
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla M10.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla M10
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	18 May 2016
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1033 MHz
Boost Clock		1306 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	52.24
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	4x 1,672 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0

GRID K260Q vs Tesla M10

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares