GRID K260Q vs UHD Graphics 630
When choosing between GRID K260Q and UHD Graphics 630, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and UHD Graphics 630.
GRID K260Q
UHD Graphics 630
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 630.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 445 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 630.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and UHD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than UHD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than UHD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | UHD Graphics 630 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.45 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |