FirePro M6100 vs GRID K280Q

In this comparison between FirePro M6100 and GRID K280Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6100 will be the best choice, for others GRID K280Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M6100 Check Price

GRID K280Q

FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:

FirePro M6100 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M6100	GRID K280Q
Power consumption (TDP)		225 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 355 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
FirePro M6100 and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	24−27
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M6100 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	180−190
medium / 768p	140−150	150−160
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
QHD / 1440p	40−45	45−50
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	80−85
ultra / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	85−90
medium / 1080p	35−40	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	16−18	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	65−70	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	65−70
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	6−7	7−8
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	9−10	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	90−95	95−100
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	18−20	20−22
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than FirePro M6100.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	35−40	40−45
medium / 768p	21−24	27−30
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than FirePro M6100.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
medium / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
high / 768p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro M6100.

Full Specs

	FirePro M6100	GRID K280Q
Architecture	GCN	Kepler
Code name	Bonaire	GK104
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2013	28 June 2013
Pipelines	768	1536
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,080 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	51.60	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,651 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	196 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
	Check Price

FirePro M6100 vs GRID K280Q

FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares