GeForce 825M vs GRID K280Q
When comparing GeForce 825M and GRID K280Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 825M and GRID K280Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID K280Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- GeForce 825M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K280Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce 825M and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1150% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 825M | GRID K280Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK208 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 27 January 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |