GeForce GT 445M vs GRID K280Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 445M and GRID K280Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 445M will be the best choice, for others GRID K280Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
GeForce GT 445M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 445M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 445M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 542% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 445M.
- GeForce GT 445M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 445M.
- GeForce GT 445M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 445M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 445M is 435 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GT 445M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 445M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 440% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 445M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 81% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 152% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 366% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 2100% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 633% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 600% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 445M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 445M | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GE | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 144 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |