GeForce GTX 470M vs GRID K280Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 470M and GRID K280Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 470M will be the best choice, for others GRID K280Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 470M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 470M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 470M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 470M | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 470M.
- GeForce GTX 470M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 470M has 1532 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 470M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 470M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 470M is 355 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 470M and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 470M | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GT | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 November 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.7 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 616.3 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |