GeForce GTX 560M vs GRID K280Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K280Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 560M stacks up against GRID K280Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1532 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and GRID K280Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 30 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |