GRID K240Q vs GRID K280Q
When comparing GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GRID K280Q
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | GRID K280Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K280Q has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| GRID K240Q and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | GRID K280Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |