GRID K280Q vs HD Graphics 530
When choosing between GRID K280Q and HD Graphics 530, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and HD Graphics 530.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
HD Graphics 530 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 530 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 530 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | HD Graphics 530 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 530.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 530 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics 530 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 530 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 530 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 395 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 530.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 530 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 530 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K280Q and HD Graphics 530 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 115% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 155% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 21% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than HD Graphics 530. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 46% more, than HD Graphics 530. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | HD Graphics 530 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |