GRID K280Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640.
GRID K280Q
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 48% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M