GRID K280Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.

GRID K280Q

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:

Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	100−110
medium / 768p	150−160	80−85
ultra / 1080p	80−85	35−40
QHD / 1440p	45−50	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	120−130	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	100−110	65−70
medium / 768p	80−85	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 77% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	12−14	5−6
4K / 2160p	5−6	3−4
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	21−24	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	85−90	45−50
medium / 1080p	40−45	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	20−22	8−9
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	70−75	40−45
medium / 768p	65−70	35−40
high / 1080p	21−24	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	7−8	3−4
ultra / 1080p	6−7	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	7−8
medium / 1080p	10−11	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	95−100	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	7−8
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	40−45	16−18
medium / 768p	27−30	12−14
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby Lake GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	10 July 2019
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	50.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K280Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares