GRID K280Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 31% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 883 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650