GRID K280Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K280Q

Iris Pro Graphics 580 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 580 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	20−22
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	18−20	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	150−160
medium / 768p	150−160	130−140
ultra / 1080p	80−85	65−70
QHD / 1440p	45−50	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	120−130	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	24−27
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	80−85	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	85−90	70−75
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 24% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
medium / 768p	65−70	50−55
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	7−8	6−7
ultra / 1080p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	10−11	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	85−90
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	40−45	30−35
medium / 768p	27−30	21−24
high / 1080p	14−16	10−12
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	50−55
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
high / 768p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name	GK104	Skylake GT4e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 September 2015
Pipelines	1536	72
Core clock speed	745 MHz	350 MHz
Boost Clock		1050 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	72.00
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.97
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K280Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares