GRID K280Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Mobility Radeon HD 4850 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4850 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4850 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 3 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - with Terascale 1.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 245 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 4150 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K280Q and Mobility Radeon HD 4850 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 78% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 87% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4850. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Terascale 1 |
Code name | GK104 | M98 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 9 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 500 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Iris Graphics 5100
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce 930M
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs Iris Graphics 5100
- Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 930M