GRID K280Q vs P106 100

In this comparison between GRID K280Q and P106 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others P106 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K280Q

P106 100

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	P106 100
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	120 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K280Q has 87% more power consumption, than P106 100.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
P106 100 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of P106 100 is 761 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 3008 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	24−27	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	40−45
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	55−60
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	2−3	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	250−260
medium / 768p	150−160	220−230
ultra / 1080p	80−85	180−190
QHD / 1440p	45−50	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	120−130	210−220
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	80−85
medium / 1080p	14−16	45−50
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	85−90	180−190
medium / 1080p	40−45	110−120
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	6−7	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	40−45	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	65−70
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	70−75	140−150
medium / 768p	65−70	120−130
high / 1080p	21−24	70−75
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−11	30−35
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	40−45	130−140
medium / 768p	27−30	85−90
high / 1080p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	50−55
high / 768p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	P106 100
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	GK104	GP106
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	19 June 2017
Pipelines	1536	1280
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1506 MHz
Boost Clock		1709 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	136.7
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	4,375 gflops
Length		250 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	3.0	6.1

GRID K280Q vs P106 100

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares