GRID K280Q vs Quadro M4000M
When comparing GRID K280Q and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Quadro M4000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K280Q and Quadro M4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 230 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Quadro M4000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1,280 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 975 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |