GRID K280Q vs Quadro M500M

When comparing GRID K280Q and Quadro M500M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Quadro M500M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K280Q

Quadro M500M Check Price

Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:

Quadro M500M Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K280Q has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
GRID K280Q and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 996 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	0−1
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	18−20	5−6
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	16−18
medium / 1080p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 212% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q.
low / 768p	180−190	110−120
medium / 768p	150−160	85−90
ultra / 1080p	80−85	40−45
QHD / 1440p	45−50	35−40
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	120−130	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	80−85	50−55
ultra / 1080p	50−55	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	10−12
medium / 1080p	14−16	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	21−24	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	85−90	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 105% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	70−75	45−50
medium / 768p	65−70	35−40
high / 1080p	21−24	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 86% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	6−7
medium / 1080p	10−11	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	20−22	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	24−27
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	6−7
medium / 1080p	14−16	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	40−45	14−16
medium / 768p	27−30	10−11
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 187% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Quadro M500M.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Quadro M500M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	15 December 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	17.98
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	863.2 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
nView Display Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K280Q vs Quadro M500M

Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares