GRID K280Q vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q.
GRID K280Q
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |