GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro 450
When comparing GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 450, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 450 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 9% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 19% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |