GRID K280Q vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K280Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |