GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro WX 5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
- GRID K280Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 32 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 5100.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 5100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q and Radeon Pro WX 5100 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Fortnite is 148% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 116% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 5100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Radeon Pro WX 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Ellesmere |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 18 November 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 713 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1086 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 121.6 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 3,892 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 250 Mh/s | |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- GRID K280Q vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics