GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K280Q

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Main Specs

	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs

Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K280Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	140−150
medium / 768p	150−160	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	55−60
QHD / 1440p	45−50	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	120−130	85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	80−85	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	14−16	9−10
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
low / 720p	85−90	65−70
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	20−22	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
medium / 768p	65−70	45−50
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	7−8	5−6
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−11	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	40−45	27−30
medium / 768p	27−30	18−20
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
high / 768p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.

Full Specs

	GRID K280Q	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	GK104	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	14 January 2014
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	720 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0

GRID K280Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares